密室逃脱100关：未上锁的房间第18关通关攻略
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | S Moonesamy , Dr. John C. Klensin | ||
| Last updated | 2025-08-08 (Latest revision 2025-08-08) | ||
| Replaces | draft-klensin-recall-rev | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The procedures for initiating a recall specified in RFC 7437 restrict signatories of a recall petition to those who are "nomcom qualified". This document suggests those limitations had unanticipated and undesirable side-effects and proposes to remove them. It also specifies that remote participants should be allowed to seek redress through the procedures and decreases the number of signatories required for a recall petition. This document updates RFC 7437.
Authors
S Moonesamy
Dr. John C. Klensin
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)